Home | Who We Are | Why Dialogue?
Why Dialogue?
Quotes on the significance of dialogue from the Network for Peace
Article by Kathleen Kanet, Published by the Daughters of Wisdom in the 2009 Fall Newsletter
It's encouaging to hear politicians on the local and global level call for dialogue as an alternative to engaging in
violence or confl ict. Dialogue is a necessary prerequisite to the making and keeping of peace. Dialogue prepares the
stage for the resolution of confl icts to be resolved and dialogue then will hold the peace together. If this stage
is skipped, the peace process can be slowed or even fall apart after the violence ceases.
Believing that dialogue is so
important in working for peace,
we at the Network for Peace
through Dialogue focus our
work to promote the practice
of dialogue and to create
and engage others in gaining
dialogue skills.
While dialogue can be
understood in some way to be
a conversation, it is more than
that. Dialogue means listening
to the other without trying to
change the other to think or to
be the way we want them to be.
It means letting the other be
who she is and recognizing and
accepting those differences. It
is listening with the intention
to understand the other person.
Dialogue demands a deep sense
of trust. It is not coming to
agreement nor is it in itself
problem solving. Yet, it sets
the stage so that confl icts may
be solved. While we may be
hearing more and more about
the need for dialogue, it is very
diffi cult to achieve. Dialogue is
hard work.
Knowing how diffi cult is
the practice of dialogue, we
make every effort to practice
it ourselves in all we do. We
model it in all our activities.
We are constant learners in the
process.
We have developed some
thoughts about what constitutes
high quality dialogue and we
use them in all of our meetings
and urge people to use them
in their meetings, classes, or
everyday discussion to evaluate
the quality of their dialogue.
#1. Responses show an
honest expression of one’s
own opinion:
PARTICIPANTS express their
own opinion rather than talking
about “them” or in universal
truths.
PARTICIPANTS relate a
similar feeling or story to what
has been said.
PARTICIPANTS state different
opinions in a non-threatening
way.
#2. Responses show
empathetic and attentive
listening:
PARTICIPANTS paraphrase
the others’ point of view.
PARTICIPANTS ask clarifying
questions.
PARTICIPANTS make
statements recognizing the
feelings of the other.
#3. Responses show an effort
to understand the other:
PARTICIPANTS respond to
others’ insights with questions,
agreements or respectful
disagreements.
PARTICIPANTS do not try to
convince others to change their
point of view.
#4. Responses show willingness to be transformed by the experience:
PARTICIPANTS state what
they have learned from others.
PARTICIPANTS acknowledge
any changes in their points of
view.
PARTICIPANTS identify their
own assumptions.
This past year we held
a Dialogue Facilitators
Networking Group (DFNG),
a gathering of twelve New
York City-based dialogue
practitioners. This group
recently concluded a sixmonth
series focusing on the
intricacies of good dialogue. It
included skill-building reviews
and exercises, discussions
about different methodologies,
and healthy consultation on
how to have disagreement and
confrontation without being
destructive. A professional
writer was present and we
have published a book on
these proceedings titled, “Who
Dialogues (and where and
when and why)”.
Our 2009 Living Room
Dialogue series on the
economic downturn brought
groups of grassroots folk
together to explore how the
economic climate has impacted
individuals, communities, and
the world at large. In addition
to the topic in those meetings,
the groups practiced various
dialogue methods. For detailed
reports on these dialogues
and of all of our programs,
please go to our website, www.
networkforpeace.com, as it is
both our archive and our way
of sharing with others how we
learn to dialogue.
Read More:
Why Dialogue?
What Constitues High Quality Dialogue?
7 Core Principles of Public Engagement
back to top
|